*British MPs pass vote of no confidence on FA
While the Nigerian Green Chambers had to postpone its own inquisition on the duo of the Nigeria Olympic Committee (NOC) and the Nigeria Football Federation (NFF) their British counterpart have already moved a motion of “no confidence” in the Football Association.
According to information reaching www.gongnews.net “we had some pressing issues affecting some of our members, so we were under no illusion we could do the event as planned. The parties had been informed that the date has shifted to sometime next week.”
The motion of no confidence in you has been passed by the British MPs debating the organisation’s ability to reform itself. While the motion is largely symbolic, MPs have warned legislation will be brought in if changes are not made.
Sports Minister Tracey Crouch has said the FA could lose £30m-£40m of public funding if it does not modernise. Culture, Media and Sport (CMS) Select Committee chairman Damian Collins said: “No change is no option.”
He added: “The FA, to use a football analogy, are not only in extra time, they are at the end of extra time, in ‘Fergie Time’. They are 1-0 down and if they don’t pick up fairly quickly, reform will be delivered to them.”
FA chairman Greg Clarke has said he will quit if the organisation cannot win government support for its reform plans.
“I watched the debate and respect the opinions of the MPs,” he said.
“As previously stated, we remain committed to reforming governance at the FA to the agreed timescale of the minister.”
Collins suggested ministers should intervene to overhaul English football’s governing body because “turkeys won’t vote for Christmas” and it will not reform itself.
Crouch warned the FA that if it played “Russian roulette” with public money it will lose.
The minister also said the government would be prepared to consider legislation if the FA fails to present plans for required reforms before April. However she felt the debate – which was sparsely attended by MPs – was premature given her desire to see the FA’s proposals.
The committee has published two reports since 2010 recommending greater representation at the FA for fans and the grassroots game, as well as more diversity in positions of authority. It also wants to dilute the perceived dominance of the Premier League.
Collins has said the FA was given six months to meet the government guidance on best practice for sports governance but had failed to do so. That guidance called for things such as a move towards gender equality on boards, more independent oversight, more accountability and term limits for office bearers.
He was joined by fellow Tories and Labour MPs – keen to ensure the “national game” is run correctly – in bemoaning the current state of the FA.
The cross-party motion stated that MPs have no confidence in the FA’s ability to comply fully with its duties as its existing governance structures make it “impossible for the organisation to reform itself”.
It was approved unopposed at the end of a backbench business debate, which was attended by fewer than 30 MPs.
The FA is effectively run by its own parliament, the FA Council, which has 122 members – just eight are women and only four from ethnic minorities. More than 90 of the 122 members are aged over 60.
Shadow sports minister Rosena Allin-Khan said: “Not only is diversity not in the heart of the FA ,it isn’t in its body, or even its soul.”
Labour MP Keith Vaz, whose constituency of Leicester East is home to the Premier League champions Leicester City, added: “A quarter of all professional footballers are black, however only 17 of the 92 top clubs have an ethnic minority person in a senior coaching role.”
However, Keith Compton – one of 25 FA life vice-presidents and a director of Derbyshire FA – questioned why the FA was being discussed in Parliament.
“It is pity that the MPs have got nothing better to do,” he told BBC Radio 5 live.
“I would have thought with the state of the NHS, the lack of building, too many people living in boxes, not enough cash for defence, that some people would put energy into that not the organisation of football.
Asked whether there should be more female and ethnic minority involvement in FA decisions, he said: “That’s not really the responsibility of the council. If those people were interested enough, and we had enough people, we would have enough women and other people on the FA.
“I have heard people say supporters aren’t represented but that is not true. They have one representative. People want the council to be reduced and now I am hearing it should be increased.”
Responding to the interview, former FA chairman David Bernstein said: “I think if you want an argument for change, you’ve just heard it.”
And Yunus Lunat, the first Muslim to get a seat on the FA Council before leaving three years ago, said new recruits were needed.
“No-one is disputing the contribution the previous generation has made but there comes a time when you have got to recognise that you are not the most suitable people for the role,” he said.